{
  "title": "A wrong answer, caught before use",
  "recordedDate": "2026-09-12",
  "evidenceLevel": "Controlled development trial with a fictional programme request",
  "sourceRevision": "dedcf8be855f8b05efd0ed6bf070ce03c064f820",
  "task": "Assign the exercise from the supplied programme lesson.",
  "firstAttempt": "The model answered as the applicant and invented skills. The engineering coordinator rejected that answer and kept it out of the sending rehearsal.",
  "correction": "The coordinator clarified that the reply should come from the programme coordinator. Only the question wording changed; no model training occurred.",
  "acceptedReply": "Here is the exercise from Lesson 1: Please write three sentences introducing your own skills, then reply when ready.",
  "reviewedResult": "The corrected reply passed engineering review for a fictional workflow replay. The replay preserved the reply and citation, held a pending result before simulated persistence, and recorded a scripted provider acknowledgement.",
  "lesson": "The first answer cited an allowed source and still invented skills. That is why the meaning needs review.",
  "limits": [
    "Two manually coordinated model attempts, not an autonomous improvement loop.",
    "The record establishes engineering review, not human-owner or customer approval.",
    "Provider acknowledgement and persistence were simulated. No real applicant was contacted.",
    "The updated app was not installed; model qualification and live business acceptance remained open.",
    "This selected pair does not establish a success rate, typical latency or a customer result."
  ],
  "provenance": "Summarised from the HeadlessBrain engineering coordinator's FIRST-MODEL-TRYOUT-2026-09-12.md and the independently approved MODEL-PILOT-2026-09-12/FINAL-REVIEW.md."
}
